[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3694BA.4080204@ds.jp.nec.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:17:14 -0400
From: Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com>
To: Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>, taka@...inux.co.jp,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>,
Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 05/11] blkiocg async: __set_page_dirty_nobuffer not to
record process info
For same reason of introducing block_commit_write_noiotrack()
in the previous patch, this patch introduces
__set_page_dirty_nobuffer_noiotrack().
redirty_page_for_writepage() calls
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers_noiotrack()
because overwriting the process info for iotrack isn't needed
when redirtying.
Signed-off-by: Munehiro "Muuhh" Ikeda <m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
mm/page-writeback.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index b969efb..08a957b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -851,6 +851,7 @@ extern int try_to_release_page(struct page * page, gfp_t gfp_mask);
extern void do_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned long offset);
int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page);
+int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers_noiotrack(struct page *page);
int __set_page_dirty_no_writeback(struct page *page);
int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
struct page *page);
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index f3e6b2c..bdd6fdb 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1099,22 +1099,11 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping)
}
}
-/*
- * For address_spaces which do not use buffers. Just tag the page as dirty in
- * its radix tree.
- *
- * This is also used when a single buffer is being dirtied: we want to set the
- * page dirty in that case, but not all the buffers. This is a "bottom-up"
- * dirtying, whereas __set_page_dirty_buffers() is a "top-down" dirtying.
- *
- * Most callers have locked the page, which pins the address_space in memory.
- * But zap_pte_range() does not lock the page, however in that case the
- * mapping is pinned by the vma's ->vm_file reference.
- *
- * We take care to handle the case where the page was truncated from the
- * mapping by re-checking page_mapping() inside tree_lock.
+/**
+ * ____set_page_dirty_nobuffers - helper function for __set_page_dirty_nobuffers*
+ * If track is true, dirtying process info will be recorded for iotrack
*/
-int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
+static int ____set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page, int track)
{
if (!TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
@@ -1129,7 +1118,9 @@ int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
BUG_ON(mapping2 != mapping);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));
account_page_dirtied(page, mapping);
- blk_iotrack_reset_owner_pagedirty(page, current->mm);
+ if (track)
+ blk_iotrack_reset_owner_pagedirty(page,
+ current->mm);
radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
}
@@ -1142,8 +1133,38 @@ int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
}
return 0;
}
+
+/*
+ * For address_spaces which do not use buffers. Just tag the page as dirty in
+ * its radix tree.
+ *
+ * This is also used when a single buffer is being dirtied: we want to set the
+ * page dirty in that case, but not all the buffers. This is a "bottom-up"
+ * dirtying, whereas __set_page_dirty_buffers() is a "top-down" dirtying.
+ *
+ * Most callers have locked the page, which pins the address_space in memory.
+ * But zap_pte_range() does not lock the page, however in that case the
+ * mapping is pinned by the vma's ->vm_file reference.
+ *
+ * We take care to handle the case where the page was truncated from the
+ * mapping by re-checking page_mapping() inside tree_lock.
+ */
+int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
+{
+ return ____set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page, 1);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_nobuffers);
+/**
+ * Same as __set_page_dirty_nobuffers, but doesn't record process
+ * info for iotrack.
+ */
+int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers_noiotrack(struct page *page)
+{
+ return ____set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_nobuffers_noiotrack);
+
/*
* When a writepage implementation decides that it doesn't want to write this
* page for some reason, it should redirty the locked page via
@@ -1152,7 +1173,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_nobuffers);
int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct page *page)
{
wbc->pages_skipped++;
- return __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
+ return __set_page_dirty_nobuffers_noiotrack(page);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
--
1.6.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists