[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100710145639.GC10080@8bytes.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:56:39 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, mel@....ul.ie,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] mm: iommu: The Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:33:51AM -0700, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> > So if we include this code which "map implementations" could you
> > collapse into this implementations ? Generally , what currently existing
> > code can VCMM help to eliminate?
>
> In theory, it can eliminate all code the interoperates between IOMMU,
> CPU and non-IOMMU based devices and all the mapping code, alignment,
> mapping attribute and special block size support that's been
> implemented.
Thats a very abstract statement. Can you point to particular code files
and give a rough sketch how it could be improved using VCMM?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists