[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100711122708.GA3573@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:27:08 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert.xu@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: add CHECKSUM target
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:56:26AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Friday 2010-07-09 00:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_CHECKSUM.h | 18 +++++++
> > net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig | 16 ++++++
> > net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile | 1 +
> > net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CHECKSUM.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> New modules should use xt.
I tried moving the module to xt_CHECKSUM but now
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t mangle -p udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill
does not to load the module.
It seems that xt_request_find_target in x_tables uses the prefix 'ip' for a module.
What am I missing?
> >+static unsigned int
> >+checksum_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
> >+{
> >+ if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
> >+ skb_checksum_help(skb);
> >+ }
>
> - {}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists