[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C39E5D7.7030703@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:40:07 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch'
On 07/11/2010 03:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 01:45 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> 'walk_addr' is out of mmu_lock's protection, so while we handle 'fetch',
>> then guest's mapping has modifited by other vcpu's write path, such as
>> invlpg, pte_write and other fetch path
>>
>> Fixed by checking all level's mapping
>>
>>
>> @@ -319,22 +319,23 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> gva_t addr,
>> direct_access&= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
>>
>> for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, addr, iterator) {
>> + bool nonpresent = false, last_mapping = false;
>> +
>
> I don't like these two new variables, but no suggestion at the
> moment. I'll try to simplify this loop later.
>
> One idea may be:
>
> while (level > walker.level) {
> handle indirect pages
> }
> while (level > hlevel) {
> handle direct pages
> }
> handle last spte
>
> I'm worried that this change is too big for backporting, but no
> suggestions on how to make it smaller, so we'll have to accept it.
Okay, I couldn't resist, posting this soon.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists