[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3B0A58.5050009@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:28:08 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic()
function
On 07/12/2010 05:55 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>>> @@ -1011,6 +1021,23 @@ pfn_t gfn_to_pfn_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
>>> return hva_to_pfn(kvm, addr, false);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +int gfn_to_page_many_atomic(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
>>> + struct page **pages, int nr_pages, bool *enough)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long addr;
>>> + int entry, ret;
>>> +
>>> + addr = gfn_to_hva_many(kvm, gfn,&entry);
>>> + if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
>>> + return -1;
>>> +
>>> + entry = min(entry, nr_pages);
>>> + *enough = (entry == nr_pages) ? true : false;
>>>
>>>
>
>> Why not return 0 if !enough?
>>
>>
> I think it's better that handle the reset pages in the slot, for example,
> we expect 16 pages are consecutive, but only 12 pages in the slot, the better
> way is handle the reset 12 pages not throw those away.
It will almost never happen, let's remove edge cases.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists