[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3B138E.4080208@monstr.eu>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:07:26 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: remove unused HAVE_ARCH_PCI_SET_DMA_MASK
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> HAVE_ARCH_PCI_SET_DMA_MASK was removed in 2.6.36 (no architecture has
> the own implementation of pci_set_dma_mask).
Added to next branch. I also fixed that kernel version.
Thanks,
Michal
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index 18b3731..5073895 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -79,12 +79,6 @@ static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> return ops->dma_supported(dev, mask);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> -/* We have our own implementation of pci_set_dma_mask() */
> -#define HAVE_ARCH_PCI_SET_DMA_MASK
> -
> -#endif
> -
> static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 dma_mask)
> {
> struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists