[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100712150522.GD5358@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:05:22 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
Cc: chris.mason@...cle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@....com, tytso@....edu,
mfasheh@...e.com, joel.becker@...cle.com, matthew@....cx,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, ngupta@...are.org,
jeremy@...p.org, JBeulich@...ell.com, kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
npiggin@...e.de, dave.mccracken@...cle.com, riel@...hat.com,
avi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleancache: shim to Xen Transcendent Memory
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:42:08AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
One nitpick:
..
> +
> +int tmem_enabled;
> +
> +static int __init enable_tmem(char *s)
> +{
> + tmem_enabled = 1;
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +__setup("tmem", enable_tmem);
Perhaps 'tmem_setup' is more appropiate as it might be that this
function in the future would be only used to disable tmem, not actually
enable it?
Otherwise, it has been reviewed by me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists