linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv9 2.6.35-rc4-tip 10/13] perf: Re-Add make_absolute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:12:39 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Naren A Devaiah <naren.devaiah@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 2.6.35-rc4-tip 10/13]  perf: Re-Add make_absolute_path

Em Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:30:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 11:00 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Also please remove the xstrdup and die calls from this function, we're
> > trying to get rid of all such 'panic' like functions so that we can
> > librarize as much code as possible.

> What I found useful with the "die" calls with trace-cmd is that I made
> them weak, and then they could be overwritten by apps. Thus, in
> kernelshark, the die and warning functions produce pop-ups and bug
> reports.

Well, I prefer to follow the kernel way of doing things, i.e. to
propagate as much as possible up the callchain the error return value,
so that the apps can handle it in any way they prefer, i.e. die() calls
in tools/perf/builtin-foo.c are okayish, but not on tools/perf/util/.

When I'm writing a tools/perf/builtin-.c file I also don't use die()
calls, as some routines may end up moving to the library, so its nice to
avoid them from the start.

The pr_{warning,err,info,etc} calls do something along the lines of what
you do, but not by marking them weak, the routine that is ultimately
called checks what kind of UI is being used and calls the appropriate
one (TUI/NEWT of stdio).

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/