lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimTdQRCoWzCYZ7yBLYsKr4P812n8UR678hktJbO@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:33:41 +0200
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Modpost error after changing CONFIG_SOUND from m to y

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 07:11:47PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:54:16 +0200 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> >> I was using the same .config for my home machine for a long time,
>> >> updating it using "make oldconfig" every time I moved to newer kernel.
>> >> It worked fine for many kernels.
>> >>
>> >> In this .config I had CONFIG_SOUND=m.
>> >>
>> >> Starting witn 2.6.34, build fails with
>> >>
>> >> sound/core/sound_oss.c:25:2: error: #error "Enable the OSS soundcore multiplexer (CONFIG_SOUND) in the kernel."
>> >>
>> >> Ok. I changed CONFIG_SOUND to y. Now the build fails at modpost:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > I can't get the build to fail (2.6.34 or 2.6.35-rc4-git4).
>> > Please provide a full/complete .config file (and that will include a
>> > kernel version number :).
>>
>> I found out that build only fails if I give empty CFLAGS_KERNEL
>> and CFLAGS_MODULE variables to make, like this:
>>
>> make CFLAGS_KERNEL="" CFLAGS_MODULE=""
>
> Messing around with kernel internal flags is bound to give
> unpredictable bugs.
>
> I this case you loose "-DMODULE" and I guess some sound specificmodules
> test on this symbol.
> And there may be other subtle side-effects.
>
> What is the intial reason why you assign CFLAGS_KERNEL and CFLAGS_MODULE?

I want to add some flags to every compiler invocation.
-- 
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ