linux-kernel - Re: stable? quality assurance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C3B585A.6090106@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:00:58 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
CC:	Marcin Letyns <mletyns@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance?

David Newall wrote:
> Thus 2.6.34 is the latest gamma-test kernel.  It's not stable and I
> doubt anybody honestly thinks otherwise.

It works stable for what I use it for.

If it doesn't for you, then I hope you are already in contact with the
respective subsystem developers to get the regressions that you
experience fixed.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- -=== -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/