[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278964147.1501.291.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:49:07 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible false positive from checkpatch.pl
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:37 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 02:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index bd88f11..7e8a3f4 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -2394,8 +2394,10 @@ sub process {
> > }x;
> > #print "REST<$rest> dstat<$dstat>\n";
> > if ($rest ne '') {
> > - if ($rest !~ /while\s*\(/&&
> > - $dstat !~ /$exceptions/)
> > + if ($rest eq ",") {
> > + ERROR("Macros should not end with a trailing comma\n" . "$here\n$ctx\n");
> > + } elsif ($rest !~ /while\s*\(/&&
> > + $dstat !~ /$exceptions/)
> > {
> > ERROR("Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while loop\n" . "$here\n$ctx\n");
> > }
>
> That looks good. At least it makes clear what is wrong.
> Should it be an error, or just a warning?
I don't much care.
If Andy wants to do anything, let him decide.
Perhaps the new test should be
if ($rest =~ /\s*,\s*$/)
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists