[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3BEAC3.9000501@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:25:39 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache()
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 04:16 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>>> btw, what about dirty logging? will prefetch cause pages to be marked
>>> dirty?
>>>
>>> We may need to instantiate prefetched pages with spte.d=0 and examine it
>>> when tearing down the spte.
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah, all speculative path are broken dirty bit tracking, and i guess
>> it's
>> need more review, so i plan to do it in the separate patch, i'll post
>> it after
>> this patchset merged, could you allow it?
>>
>>
>
> Regressions? no. Or do you mean the problem already exists? Where?
I mean this is a exist problem, likes invlpg, pte-write and sync-page, there are
speculative path that it's not real access, but marked dirty if pte is writable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists