[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100713072009.GA19839@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:20:09 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Yakui Zhao <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:04:00PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > __get_user() works with TLB and page table, the vaddr is really mapped or not.
> > If you got SEGV, __get_user() returns -EFAULT. It works per page granule.
Not in kernel space. It works on 1MB sections there.
Testing whether a page is mapped by __get_user is a hugely expensive
way to test whether a PFN is valid. It'd be cheaper to use our
flatmem implementation of pfn_valid() instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists