[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3C6106.3000909@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:50:14 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Alejandro Riveira Fernández <ariveira@...il.com>
CC: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap (was Re: stable?
quality assurance?)
Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> I for one stopped booting into -rc kernels.
> The fact that still have to patch my kernels with a *one* liner
> since 2.6.29 kernel [1] does not give me confidence on the "test
> report/bisect and it will be fixed" promise some have made in this
> threath
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
There were promises made in this thread? Then I must have read a
different mailinglist or so.
I do not know why your WLAN regression has not been fixed yet, but at
least it seems rather plausible why commit
7e0986c17f695952ce5d61ed793ce048ba90a661 is not going to be reverted (if
such a revert is the one-liner that you are referring to).
Why is one reporter's rt2500 OK now though but not yours? Are there
different card revisions or firmwares out there that require quirk handling?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- -=== -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists