linux-kernel - rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap (was Re: stable? quality assurance?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:50:14 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Alejandro Riveira Fernández <ariveira@...il.com>
CC:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap (was Re: stable?
 quality assurance?)

Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
>  I for one stopped booting into -rc kernels.
>  The fact that still have to patch my kernels with a *one* liner
>  since 2.6.29 kernel [1] does not give me confidence on the "test
>  report/bisect and it will be fixed" promise some have made in this
>  threath
>  
>  [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362

There were promises made in this thread?  Then I must have read a
different mailinglist or so.

I do not know why your WLAN regression has not been fixed yet, but at
least it seems rather plausible why commit
7e0986c17f695952ce5d61ed793ce048ba90a661 is not going to be reverted (if
such a revert is the one-liner that you are referring to).

Why is one reporter's rt2500 OK now though but not yours?  Are there
different card revisions or firmwares out there that require quirk handling?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- -=== -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/