[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201007132328.28853.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:28:28 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pm: Add runtime PM statistics
On Monday, July 12, 2010, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:26:07 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > > +
> > > static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_usage, 0444, rtpm_usagecount_show,
> > > NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_active_kids, 0444,
> > > rtpm_children_show, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_status, 0444,
> > > rtpm_status_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_active_time,
> > > 0444, rtpm_active_time_show, NULL); +static
> > > DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_suspended_time, 0444, rtpm_suspended_time_show,
> > > NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_enabled, 0444, rtpm_enabled_show,
> > > NULL);
> >
> > On a second thought, "active_time" and "suspended_time" should be
> > sufficient (ie. the "runtime_" prefix is not really necessary).
>
> it's not necessary but it's consistent with the others... so yes
> I can change it but then it's no longer consistent naming.. are you sure
> you want this changed?
No, you're right, sorry.
But can you rebase your patch on top of linux-next, please, and move the
definitions of the new attributes next to 'control' and 'runtime_status' (so
that they don't depend on 'debug')?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists