[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007131925010.10598@xanadu.home>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:39:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Eric Miao <eric.miao@...onical.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: optimized script [Was: ARM defconfig files]
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:07:05AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
> > > > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net> wrote:
> > > > >> I think Uwe could provide his script and add it to the kernel tree.
> > > > >> Then all architectures could benefit from it. Having the defconfig
> > > > >> files contain only those options which are different from the defaults
> > > > >> is certainly more readable, even on x86.
> > > > >
> > > > > Quite possible. But maintainers would need to be on the lookout of
> > > > > people actually using the script, and refusing to apply patches that
> > > > > re-introduce the whole big thing.
> > > >
> > > > I can (partially) speak for powerpc. If ARM uses this approach, then
> > > > I think we can do the same. After the defconfigs are trimmed, I
> > > > certainly won't pick up any more full defconfigs.
> > > I just restarted my script on the powerpc defconfigs basing on rc5, I
> > > assume they complete in a few days time.
> > So Stephen was faster than me. I don't know yet how he optimised my
> > script, meanwhile I put some efforts into it, too by just checking lines
> > that match "^(# )?CONFIG_".
> >
> > Find it attached.
> >
> > I will start to reduce the remaining configs (i.e. all but arm and
> > powerpc).
>
> I added just a simple heuristic: If I could remove a line, I attempted
> to remove twice the amount next time around (and fall back to 1 if it failed).
>
[...]
>
> While this script is great, it is somewhat painful to run given that it
> attempts one config per line. Even on a fast machine that tends to take
> a while.
The optimal solution is to add that .config reduction ability straight
into the Kconfig parser (scripts/kconfig/*). There you can find out
right away what are the non default state for each config option without
actually trying them out one by one.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists