linux-kernel - Re: ARM defconfig files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTincDKhGYRzFJlK5ovtygTfjJVQDvXYZlITAsmT7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:21:59 +0300
From:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Eric Miao <eric.miao@...onical.com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > When you brought up the problem you seemed absolutely convinced
>> > that nothing except your solution was going to be acceptable.
>>
>> That's not true. What's true is that you didn't seem to _understand_
>> my solution, so I tried to push the understanding of it.
>
> That's your point of view.
>
> My viewpoint was that I had read your email, thought of some alternative
> solution, proposed it and the result was shot down without any apparant
> thought about it.  That gave the impression that you _only_ wanted to
> see your own solution.

I think you got it wrong. Linus liked my proposal of minimal
defconfigs, and the only discrepancy was on the format:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/995419

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/