[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100714094952.GA16209@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:49:52 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Pankaj Thakkar <pthakkar@...are.com>,
"pv-drivers@...are.com" <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] RFC: Network Plugin Architecture (NPA) for vmxnet3
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 08:06:28PM -0700, Shreyas Bhatewara wrote:
> drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c | 1845
> +++++++++++++++++++--------------
Your patch is line-wrapped and can not be applied :(
Care to fix your email client?
One thing just jumped out at me when glancing at this:
> +static INLINE void
> +MoveMemory(void *dst,
> + void *src,
> + size_t length)
> +{
> + size_t i;
> + for (i = 0; i < length; ++i)
> + ((u8 *)dst)[i] = ((u8 *)src)[i];
> +}
> +
> +static INLINE void
> +ZeroMemory(void *memory,
> + size_t length)
> +{
> + size_t i;
> + for (i = 0; i < length; ++i)
> + ((u8 *)memory)[i] = 0;
> +}
Is there some reason that our in-kernel functions that do this type of
logic are not working for you to require you to reimplement this?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists