linux-kernel - RE: [Pv-drivers] RFC: Network Plugin Architecture (NPA) for vmxnet3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:18:22 -0700
From:	Pankaj Thakkar <pthakkar@...are.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	"pv-drivers@...are.com" <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [Pv-drivers] RFC: Network Plugin Architecture (NPA) for vmxnet3

The plugin is guest agnostic and hence we did not want to rely on any kernel provided functions. The plugin uses only the interface provided by the shell. The assumption is that since the plugin is really simple and straight forward (all the control/init complexity lies in the PF driver in the hypervisor) we should be able to get by for most of the things and for things like memcpy/memset the plugin can write simple functions like this.

-p

________________________________________
From: Greg KH [greg@...ah.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 2:49 AM
To: Shreyas Bhatewara
Cc: Christoph Hellwig; Stephen Hemminger; Pankaj Thakkar; pv-drivers@...are.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] RFC: Network Plugin Architecture (NPA) for vmxnet3

Is there some reason that our in-kernel functions that do this type of
logic are not working for you to require you to reimplement this?

thanks,

greg k-h--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/