[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3E20B3.6020007@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:40:19 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Palfrader <peter@...frader.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 134/149] x86, paravirt: Add a global synchronization point
for pvclock
On 07/14/2010 01:16 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 08:57 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Anything else?
>
> 1. set up a mapping
> 2. invlpg or set cr3
> 3. use the mapping
>
> Moving the invlpg will break your code.
invlpg uses memory clobbers. All the crX ops seem to use a
__force_order variable to sequence them - but it looks like it's done
precisely backwards and it's barking mad to do allow write_crX to be
reordered with respect to memory ops.
Hm, looks like glommer added it surreptitiously while unifying
system_32.h and system_64.h (system_32.h relied on asm volatile not
being reordered; system_64.h used memory clobbers).
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists