[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3E2AE6.30406@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:23:50 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tip/master broken with x2apic and kexec
On 07/14/2010 01:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 04:27 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 07/13/2010 03:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2010 07:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> tip/master:
>>>> system1: BIOS enabled x2apic, first kernel boot well, and when kexec second kernel will cause system instant reboot.
>>>>
>>>> system2: BIOS not enable x2apic, first kernel boot well and enable x2apic, and kexec second kernel well. but when kexec third kernel will case system instant reboot.
>>>>
>>>> linus' tree is ok.
>>>>
>>>> but for system2 if boot with nox2apic ,intr-remaping off, iommu off, the kexec loop test will pass.
>>>>
>>>> the problem looks start in recent two or three weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Any idea?
>>>>
>>>> bisecting will take a while, because the system post take a while everytime.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Yinghai Lu
>>>
>>> OK, I found the bug... if you could test out the patch which will be
>>> sent out shortly I would very much appreciate it.
>>
>> not sure if your patch is the offending one now.
>>
>> kL: kernel from linus tree
>> kT1: kernel from tip
>> kT2: kernel from tip with reverting your patch
>>
>> BIOS-->kL ---> kL ---> kL....always working
>> BIOS-->kT1 ---> kT1 ---> kT1 : between second one and third one system reset instant...
>> BIOS-->kT2 ---> kT2 ---> kT2 : between second one and third one system reset instant...
>>
>> BIOS-->kL ---> kL ---> kL ---> then kT1 ---> kT1 .... always working
>> BIOS-->kL ---> kL ---> kL ---> then kT2 ---> kT2 .... always working
>>
>
> bisecting said:
>
>> git bisect good
> 58687acba59266735adb8ccd9b5b9aa2c7cd205b is the first bad commit
> commit 58687acba59266735adb8ccd9b5b9aa2c7cd205b
> Author: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
> Date: Fri May 7 17:11:44 2010 -0400
>
> lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector
>
> The new nmi_watchdog (which uses the perf event subsystem) is very
> similar in structure to the softlockup detector. Using Ingo's
> suggestion, I combined the two functionalities into one file:
> kernel/watchdog.c.
>
> Now both the nmi_watchdog (or hardlockup detector) and softlockup
> detector sit on top of the perf event subsystem, which is run every
> 60 seconds or so to see if there are any lockups.
>
> To detect hardlockups, cpus not responding to interrupts, I
> implemented an hrtimer that runs 5 times for every perf event
> overflow event. If that stops counting on a cpu, then the cpu is
> most likely in trouble.
>
> To detect softlockups, tasks not yielding to the scheduler, I used the
> previous kthread idea that now gets kicked every time the hrtimer fires.
> If the kthread isn't being scheduled neither is anyone else and the
> warning is printed to the console.
>
> I tested this on x86_64 and both the softlockup and hardlockup paths
> work.
>
with
# CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR is not set
# CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR is not set
kexec loop test could passed.
also that patch will break x2apic preenabled system 's kexec/kdump.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists