[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201007140019.o6E0J9gQ060582@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:19:09 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: kees.cook@...onical.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Yama: turn process ancestry check into function
Kees Cook wrote:
> +static int task_is_descendant(struct task_struct *parent,
> + struct task_struct *child)
> +{
> + int rc = 0;
> + struct task_struct *walker = child;
> +
> + if (!parent || !child)
> + return 0;
parent (== current) is !NULL and
child (in original code) is !NULL.
You can remove this check unless you are planning to call
this function from other places.
> + if (mode == PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH &&
> + ptrace_scope &&
> + !task_is_descendant(current, child) &&
> + !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> + rc = -EPERM;
I don't know how heavy capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE) is.
But checking !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE) before
!task_is_descendant(current, child) might be lighter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists