[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1279078016.10995.58.camel@nimitz>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:26:56 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Allow sysfs memory directories to be split
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:35 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 2. I'd like to write a configfs module for handling memory hotplug even when
> sysfs directroy is not created.
> Because configfs support rmdir/mkdir, the user (ppc's daemon?) has to do
>
> When offlining section X.
> # insmod configfs_memory.ko
> # mount -t configfs none /configfs
> # mkdir /configfs/memoryX
> # echo offline > /configfs/memoryX/state
> # rmdir /configfs/memoryX
>
> And making this operation as the default bahavior for all arch's memory hotplug may
> be better...
>
> Dave, how do you think ? Because ppc guys uses "probe" interface already,
> this can be handled... no ?
I think creating a interface to duplicate the existing sysfs one is a
bad idea. I also think removing the existing sysfs one isn't feasible
since there are users, and it's truly part of the ABI. So, I'm not
really a fan on the configfs interface. :(
I really do think the sysfs interface is fixable. We should at least
give it a good shot before largely duplicating its functionality.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists