[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikmuK0iWDjmG6lVgPyoZAHQ7ZdJmQobVrAQmgNh@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:51:33 -0300
From: Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tproxy: nf_tproxy_assign_sock() can handle tw sockets
Hi,
2010/7/14 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>:
>> I can, but my bosses will kick my ass if I bring down the ISP again :)
>
> I have no guarantee at all, even if we find the bug.
Ok :-)
>> If you think it's the only way to find the problem I'll tell them that
>> I need to do it. In this case, please tell me what other config
>> options/tools I can use to get as much info as possible...since I'll
>> probably be able to test this only once more on the production
>> environment for debugging purposes.
>
> You really should try to setup a lab to trigger the bug, and not doing
> experiments on production :)
Right, I'm trying.
The thing is: The ISP is a 200Mbps network with 10,000 users. The
first time it took around 2 minutes to trigger the bug. The second
time it took around 17 minutes.
So I *think* it's some TCP flag with some weird content...but I can't
find out what it is so I can trigger it on the lab.
So my only guess is to enable every possible debug flag I can think of
to track the bug down on the production environment. Any hints here
would be appreciated :)
Cheers,
Felipe Damasio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists