[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100714061216.GV6104@outflux.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:12:16 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
To: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Yama: verify inode is symlink to avoid bind mounts
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:30:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The inode_follow_link LSM hook is called in bind mount situations as
> well as for symlink situations, so we must explicitly check for the
> inode being a symlink to not reject bind mounts in 1777 directories,
> which seems to be a common NFSv4 configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
> ---
> security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> index 3b76386..c70eb10 100644
> --- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ static int yama_inode_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry,
> if (!protected_sticky_symlinks)
> return 0;
>
> + /* if inode isn't a symlink, don't try to evaluate blocking it */
> + if (!S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
> + return 0;
> +
> /* owner and follower match? */
> cred = current_cred();
> inode = dentry->d_inode;
Erg, please ignore this -- I tested a slightly different version of this
patch. This version doesn't have inode set yet. I will follow up with the
correct one in a moment...
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists