[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100715041613.GB2583@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:16:13 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: remove CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:40:27PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:54:50 -0700
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> >> This is no longer needed by any userspace tools, so it's safe to
> >> remove.
> >
> > Makes my FC6 test box not boot - can't find /dev/root. Then when I go
> > back to plain old mainline (2.6.35-rc5) and run `make oldconfig', the
> > .config change sticks:
> >
> > @@ -106,8 +106,7 @@
> > CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=17
> > CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK=y
> > # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
> > -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
> > -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y
> > +# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set
> > CONFIG_RELAY=y
> > CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y
> > # CONFIG_UTS_NS is not set
> >
> > and the box still won't boot.
>
> The reason FC6 doesn't boot is there is a userspace tool
> I believe in the initrd that cares about symlinks when it should
> not.
Anyone happen to know which tool it is? I remember we had had issues
with FC3 around this area, but I thought we resolved them, so it's
supprising to me that FC6 has issues.
> What is more interesting is that currently there is a bug in
> 2.6.35-rc5 where rmmod <netdriver> modprobe <netdriver> will in fact
> fail. There was an inadvertent regression and no one has noticed or
> complained. I spotted it by code review just a little bit ago and I
> haven't had a chance to write and test the fix yet.
>
> If the code is going to start bitrotting and no one is going to
> notice or care simply removing the code instead of subjecting users
> to weird unexpected breakage seems like a responsible thing to do.
Yeah, that's what prompted this removal. After the s390 guys said that
they were all good to go, I figured no one else would have problems with
it :)
If it turns out there still are issues with older userspaces like FC6
that we can't resolve, I have no problem dropping this patch and then we
will have to fix up the regression.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists