lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:06:03 +0200 From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [AppArmor #5 0/13] AppArmor security module On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote: > This is the fifth general posting of the newest version of the > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure. > > Development is on going and > improvements to file, capability, network, resource usage and ipc mediation > are planned. > > With this submission we believe AppArmor is ready for inclusion into > the kernel. > > _Issues NOT specifically addressed_ > * The d_namespace_path function still manually strips the " (deleted)" > string that __d_path appends. A fix to __d_path is being pursued > independently of the AppArmor submission. Latest posting on that front: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/6/186 Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists