| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <544AC56F16B56944AEC3BD4E3D5917712E7EA5A21C@LIMKCMBX1.ad.analog.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:44:41 +0100 From: "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com> To: "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de> CC: "uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org" <uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Frysinger, Michael" <Michael.Frysinger@...log.com> Subject: EXPORT_SYMBOL set_irq_noprobe, set_irq_chip_and_handler, irq_to_desc ? We added some irq_chip functionality to the ADP5588 GPIO driver. I wonder whether these symbol should be better exported or not? ERROR: "set_irq_noprobe" [drivers/gpio/adp5588-gpio.ko] undefined! ERROR: "set_irq_chip_and_handler" [drivers/gpio/adp5588-gpio.ko] undefined! ERROR: "irq_to_desc" [drivers/gpio/adp5588-gpio.ko] undefined! Some other drivers avoid the same issue by preventing the driver being built as module. Is that the way to go? Best regards, Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------ ********* Analog Devices GmbH Open Platform Solutions ** ***** ** ** Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Strasse 6 ** ***** D-80807 Munich ********* Germany Registergericht München HRB 40368, Geschäftsführer: Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret K. Seif -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists