[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100715145509.GB6511@localhost>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:55:09 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi
dirty thresholds
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:56:43AM +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:06:59 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > +void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> > + unsigned long dirty)
>
> It'd be nice to have some documentation for these things. They're
> non-static, non-obvious and are stuffed to the gills with secret magic
> numbers.
Good suggestion, here is an attempt to document the functions.
Thanks,
Fengguang
---
Subject: add comment to the dirty limit functions
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Date: Thu Jul 15 09:54:25 CST 2010
Document global_dirty_limits() and bdi_dirty_limit().
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2010-07-15 08:20:32.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2010-07-15 10:39:41.000000000 +0800
@@ -390,6 +390,15 @@ unsigned long determine_dirtyable_memory
return x + 1; /* Ensure that we never return 0 */
}
+/**
+ * global_dirty_limits - background writeback and dirty throttling thresholds
+ *
+ * Calculate the dirty thresholds based on sysctl parameters
+ * - vm.dirty_background_ratio or vm.dirty_background_bytes
+ * - vm.dirty_ratio or vm.dirty_bytes
+ * The dirty limits will be lifted by 1/4 for PF_LESS_THROTTLE (ie. nfsd) and
+ * runtime tasks.
+ */
void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
{
unsigned long background;
@@ -424,8 +433,18 @@ void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *
*pdirty = dirty;
}
-unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
- unsigned long dirty)
+/**
+ * bdi_dirty_limit - current task's share of dirty throttling threshold on @bdi
+ *
+ * Once the global dirty limit is _exceeded_, all dirtiers will be throttled.
+ * To avoid starving fast devices (which can sync dirty pages in short time) or
+ * throttling light dirtiers, we start throttling individual tasks on a per-bdi
+ * basis when _approaching_ the global dirty limit. Relative high limits will
+ * be allocated to fast devices and/or light dirtiers. The bdi's dirty share is
+ * evaluated adapting to its throughput and bounded if the bdi->min_ratio
+ * and/or bdi->max_ratio parameters are set.
+ */
+unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned long dirty)
{
u64 bdi_dirty;
long numerator, denominator;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists