[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1279217784.2751.7.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:16:24 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix x2apic preenabled system with kexec
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 00:00 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Found one x2apic system kexec loop test failed
> when CONFIG_NMI_WATCHDOG=y (old) or CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y (current tip)
>
> first kernel can kexec second kernel, but second kernel can not kexec third one.
>
> it can be duplicated on another system with BIOS preenabled x2apic.
> First kernel can not kexec second kernel.
>
> It turns out, when kernel boot with pre-enabled x2apic, it will not execute
> disable_local_APIC on shutdown path.
>
> when init_apic_mappings() is called in setup_arch, it will skip setting of
> apic_phys when x2apic_mode is set. ( x2apic_mode is much early check_x2apic())
> Then later, disable_local_APIC() will bail out early because !apic_phys.
>
> So check !x2apic_mode in x2apic_mode in disable_local_APIC with !apic_phys.
Thanks for the nice debug work! As we still have NMI enabled, it looks
like we get a NMI during kexec and as we reset gdt/idt before kexec
launch, we might get a triple fault causing the system to reboot.
> another solution could be updating init_apic_mappings() to set apic_phys even
> for preenabled x2apic system. Actually even for x2apic system, that lapic
> address is mapped already in early stage.
Below patch is the right one. We should probably unmap apic_phys mapping
when x2apic is enabled by the OS.
> BTW: is there any x2apic preenabled system with apicid of boot cpu > 255?
I am not sure. There might be one. Is there any bug which can't handle
this condition?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org
For this patch:
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ void disable_local_APIC(void)
> unsigned int value;
>
> /* APIC hasn't been mapped yet */
> - if (!apic_phys)
> + if (!x2apic_mode && !apic_phys)
> return;
>
> clear_local_APIC();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists