linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Add support for NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:46:03 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Add support for NO_BOOTMEM configurations

On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:16 +0100, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On 07/15/2010 07:58 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: 
> > With commits 08677214 and 59be5a8e, alloc_bootmem()/free_bootmem() and
> > friends use the early_res functions for memory management when
> > NO_BOOTMEM is enabled. This patch adds the kmemleak calls in the
> > corresponding code paths for bootmem allocations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> > Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> 
> should be for 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.

I only noticed it recently since we don't have NO_BOOTMEM on ARM.
Anyway, I'll cc stable@...nel.org when pushing the patch to Linus.

Should I consider your reply as an acked-by?

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/