[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100716112109.GJ13117@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:21:09 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nishimura Daisuke <d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] memcg: add mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate tracepoint
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:18:18PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> Memcg also need to trace page isolation information as global reclaim.
> This patch does it.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> index e37fe72..eefd399 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
>
> );
>
> +DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(int order,
> + unsigned long nr_requested,
I just spotted that this is badly named by myself. It should have been
order.
> + unsigned long nr_scanned,
> + unsigned long nr_taken,
> + unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
> + unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
> + unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
> + int isolate_mode),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode)
> +
> +);
> +
> TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_writepage,
>
> TP_PROTO(struct page *page,
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 81bc9bf..82e191f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>
> +#include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
> +
> +
Excessive whitespace there.
Otherwise, I didn't spot any problems.
> struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys __read_mostly;
> #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES 5
> struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup __read_mostly;
> @@ -1042,6 +1045,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> }
>
> *scanned = scan;
> +
> + trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate(0, nr_to_scan, scan, nr_taken,
> + 0, 0, 0, mode);
> +
> return nr_taken;
> }
>
> --
> 1.6.5.2
>
>
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists