[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1279284312-2411-16-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:45:11 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 15/16] writeback: clean-up the warning about non-registered bdi
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
In '__mark_inode_dirty()', when the corresponding bdi was not properly
registered, we print a warning. But the corresponding code is a bit
untidy, it used if and 'WARN_ON(1)' and printk.
This patch turns it into one multi-line WARN() statement which looks
tidier and also uses 'unlikely()' for the condition which might matter
a tiny bit for this hot-path function.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 9 +++------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 559092d..83662fb 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -981,12 +981,9 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
struct bdi_writeback *wb = &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb;
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi;
- if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
- !test_bit(BDI_registered, &bdi->state)) {
- WARN_ON(1);
- printk(KERN_ERR "bdi-%s not registered\n",
- bdi->name);
- }
+ WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
+ !test_bit(BDI_registered, &bdi->state),
+ "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
list_move(&inode->i_list, &wb->b_dirty);
--
1.7.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists