linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] Kconfig: Enable Kconfig fragments to be used for defconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:29:49 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Kconfig: Enable Kconfig fragments to be used for
 defconfig

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Grant Likely wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Catalin Marinas
> <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 19:46 +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > DOH.
> >>
> >> Well, it's possible that the correct approach is a mixture.
> >>
> >> Automatically do the trivial cases (recursive selects, dependencies
> >> that are simple or of the form "x && y" etc), and warn about the cases
> >> that aren't trivial (where "not trivial" may not necessarily be about
> >> fundamentally ambiguous ones, but just "complex enough that I won't
> >> even try").
> >
> > There is still a risk with this approach when the Kconfig isn't entirely
> > correct. For example, on ARM we have (I pushed a patch already):
> >
> > config CPU_32v6K
> >        depends on CPU_V6
> >
> > config CPU_V7
> >        select CPU_32v6K
> >
> > In this simple approach, we end up selecting CPU_V6 when we only need
> > CPU_V7. There other places like this in the kernel.
> >
> > Of course, kbuild could still warn but if people rely on this feature to
> > select options automatically I suspect they would ignore the warnings.
> 
> In my first patch, I made Kconfig problems errors instead of warnings.
>  That would prevent people from ignoring them.

ACK.


Nicolas