linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinZwjJDO7DendPYE6-AuysleKIuKgpkysYRTIzE@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:34:06 -0500
From:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> After merging the cifs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:50:
> fs/cifs/fscache.h:49: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
>
> Caused by commit 07be494ba2f46852ec6d1faab8111f5179cc7bb4 ("cifs: define
> server-level cache index objects and register them").
> CONFIG_CIFS_FSCACHE is not defined in this build.
>
> I have used the cifs tree from next-20100715 for today.

Thx.  I have fixed this in cifs-2.6.git

There were three places where Suresh's fscache patch set for cifs
forgot ifdefs or misdefined the stub function (when fscache support is
turned off).

-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/