[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C42B98E.4020208@vflare.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:51:34 +0530
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Use xvmalloc to store compressed chunks
On 07/18/2010 01:23 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Nitin Gupta wrote:
>> @@ -528,17 +581,32 @@ static int zcache_store_page(struct zcache_inode_rb *znode,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - dest_data = kmap_atomic(zpage, KM_USER0);
>> + local_irq_save(flags);
>
> Does xv_malloc() required interrupts to be disabled? If so, why doesn't the function do it by itself?
>
xvmalloc itself doesn't require disabling interrupts but zcache needs that since
otherwise, we can have deadlock between xvmalloc pool lock and mapping->tree_lock
which zcache_put_page() is called. OTOH, zram does not require this disabling of
interrupts. So, interrupts are disable separately for zcache case.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists