linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/12] sound/alsa/soc/codec: fix memory leak and resource relaim in error path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:41:20 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] sound/alsa/soc/codec: fix memory leak and resource 
	relaim in error path

hi Mark,

2010/7/15 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:49:07AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>
>> [PATCH 1/12] ad1836: fix a memory leak if another ad1836 is registered
>> [PATCH 2/12] ak4642: fix a memory leak if failed to initialise AK4642
>> [PATCH 3/12] da7210: fix a memory leak if failed to initialise da7210 audio codec
>> [PATCH 4/12] wm8523: fix resource reclaim in wm8523_register error path
>> [PATCH 5/12] wm8711: fix a memory leak if another WM8711 is registered
>> [PATCH 6/12] wm8904: fix resource reclaim in wm8904_register error path
>> [PATCH 7/12] wm8940: fix resource reclaim in wm8940_register error path
>> [PATCH 8/12] wm8955: fix resource reclaim in wm8955_register error path
>> [PATCH 9/12] wm8961: fix resource reclaim in wm8961_register error path
>> [PATCH 10/12] wm8974: fix a memory leak if another WM8974 is registered
>> [PATCH 11/12] wm8978: fix a memory leak if another WM8978 is registered
>> [PATCH 12/12] wm9081: fix resource reclaim in wm9081_register error path
>
> If you're going to be submiting large batches of small patches like this
> it would be really helpful if you could make sure you format the subject
> lines for your patches so that they match the standards for the area of
> the kernel you're updating.  This makes them much easier to apply.
>

After checking Liam's multi-component branch, I think this serial of
fix is not necessary.
If you think it still has value to merge this serial of fix for
current implementation, just let me know.

Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/