| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTilDbrA6lLPSOAtA8_4mLNkUZibHweTliqU5jd03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:31:47 -0700 From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@...il.com> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Drives missing at boot On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote: > Hello, > > On 07/07/2010 07:06 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> 4 warm reboots. All 4 said 300 300. However the 4th one only showed an >> extra attempt at running the patch code with and also showed Tries = >> 2. I'm attaching boot #1 and boot #4 for now. I've saved them all if >> you need or just want them. >> >> Please note that in all 4 cases all drives were found. Nothing is >> missing in any test yet after adding these either of these patches. >> >> I've not tried cold boots yet. That's next. > > Hmm... just in case you're being lucky, please keep an eye on it over > several days and report the result. I think all that's necessary is > slight modification to the resume logic but let's watch a bit first. > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun > Tejun, With about 10-12 day of testing, 1-2 boots/day, I've not had a single boot failure since adding the patch. Only twice has it said tries=2. Every other time it's tries=1. The machine seems to work fine either way. Thanks, Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists