[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1279573348.21763.9.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:02:28 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To: Tomasz Buchert <Tomasz.Buchert@...ia.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] posix-timers: Refactoring of CPUCLOCK* macros
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 22:59 +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Daniel Walker a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 13:34 +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> >> This is merely a preparation to introduce wall time
> >> clocks for threads/processes. All occurences of
> >> CPUCLOCK* macros were replaced by CLOCK*.
> >
> > It seems like it would be better to make this naming more specific that
> > less. Couldn't you say "POSIX_CLOCK" or something like that?
> >
> > Daniel
> Hi Daniel.
> Sure. However, technically, my wall clocks have nothing to do
> with POSIX. Still the code is inside a file with "posix" prefix,
> so you are right.
> I will resend patch series as soon as it is done. Could you
> elaborate on another patches?
I wasn't suggesting that adding "POSIX" is the only option, but adding
something more so it's not just "CLOCK" .
You mean you want me to review the other patches also ?
Daniel
--
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists