lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mikpe@...uu.se
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] math-emu: correct test for downshifting fraction in
 _FP_FROM_INT()

From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:58:42 +0200

> The kernel's math-emu code contains a macro _FP_FROM_INT() which is
> used to convert an integer to a raw normalized floating-point value.
> It does this basically in three steps:
> 
> 1. Compute the exponent from the number of leading zero bits.
> 2. Downshift large fractions to put the MSB in the right position
>    for normalized fractions.
> 3. Upshift small fractions to put the MSB in the right position.
> 
> There is an boundary error in step 2, causing a fraction with its
> MSB exactly one bit above the normalized MSB position to not be
> downshifted.  This results in a non-normalized raw float, which when
> packed becomes a massively inaccurate representation for that input.
> 
> The impact of this depends on a number of arch-specific factors,
> but it is known to have broken emulation of FXTOD instructions
> on UltraSPARC III, which was originally reported as GCC bug 44631
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44631>.
> 
> Any arch which uses math-emu to emulate conversions from integers to
> same-size floats may be affected.
> 
> The fix is simple: the exponent comparison used to determine if the
> fraction should be downshifted must be "<=" not "<".
> 
> I'm sending a kernel module to test this as a reply to this message.
> There are also SPARC user-space test cases in the GCC bug entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>

Thanks for fixing this Mikael:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

Has anyone done an audit to compare the copy of math-emu in glibc, gcc,
and the linux kernel so that we don't have bugs living in some places
but not others?

These sources really need to be consolidated somehow.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ