[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100720072621.GB30592@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:26:22 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, agk@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v2
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:27:46PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 09:52 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v2
> >
> > Updated version with the per CPU access improvements Eric suggested.
> Hi,
>
> seems that this approach is probably the best one we can use now...
> (I would better see threads in crypto layer but that's taken of
> the programme for today, seems.)
>
> I did some tests and it works for me, even tries some strange stacked
> mapping etc.
> Do you have some exact numbers for particular tests btw?
I had some, but can't find them right now, sorry.
The original motivation was one benchmark on encrypted fs
which gave terrible results. But unfortunately I didn't get updated
numbers with the patch for that one.
The patch also seems to already have a small user base,
at least I got a few requests for it.
>
> Anyway, I have just one comment - please can we make the per-cpu attribute
> for IV generic? IOW not add explicit ie (ESSIV) but void * iv_private
> - see attached patch.
Fine for me.
>
> (I'll try discuss this with Alasdair to review for next merge
> window, I think you requested that already in some private mail...)
Yes. Thanks.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists