linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: fix boot without RAM on node0 again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100720122831.f1aad864.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:28:31 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: fix boot without RAM on node0 again

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:16:00 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> On 07/20/2010 11:35 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> That was not what Linus (and I) asked you to do.  He asked specifically
> that you resend them under a separate 0/2 cover with an explanation.
> 

And this patch is missing my patch which fixed up that block comment.

I'll send both these patches into Linus today.  I'm a bit behind due to
various linux-next catastrophies.

Catastrophies which have been known about for up to a week, yet all the
offending patches are still in linux-next, unaltered.  Go figure.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/