[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C4626FD.7010702@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:45:17 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] x86, xsave: check cpuid level for XSTATE_CPUID
(0x0d)
On 07/20/2010 03:26 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 11:50 -0700, Robert Richter wrote:
>> The patch adds a check that tests if XSTATE_CPUID exists.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
>
> While we are at this, can you please rename the other hardcoded 0xd's
> with XSTATE_CPUID in xsave.c?
>
>> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
>
> Can we use boot_cpu_data instead of cpu_data(0).
>
Not the same thing!
boot_cpu_data is the intersection of all the boot CPU features (and yes,
it's misnamed); cpu_data(0) is the CPU data for CPU 0.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists