[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C469BA1.7050900@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:02:57 +0900
From: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com,
izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] skb: add tracepoints to freeing skb
(2010/07/20 20:50), Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:49:10AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote:
>> [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] skb: add tracepoints to freeing skb
>> This patch adds tracepoint to consume_skb, dev_kfree_skb_irq and
>> skb_free_datagram_locked. Combinating with tracepoint on dev_hard_start_xmit,
>> we can check how long it takes to free transmited packets. And using it, we can
>> calculate how many packets driver had at that time. It is useful when a drop of
>> transmited packet is a problem.
>>
>> <idle>-0 [001] 241409.218333: consume_skb: skbaddr=dd6b2fb8
>> <idle>-0 [001] 241409.490555: dev_kfree_skb_irq: skbaddr=f5e29840
>>
>> udp-recv-302 [001] 515031.206008: skb_free_datagram_locked: skbaddr=f5b1d900
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> include/trace/events/skb.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/core/datagram.c | 1 +
>> net/core/dev.c | 2 ++
>> net/core/skbuff.c | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
>> index 4b2be6d..84c9041 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
>> @@ -35,6 +35,48 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
>> __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location)
>> );
>>
>> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(free_skb,
>> +
>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(skb),
>> +
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field( void *, skbaddr )
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->skbaddr = skb;
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_printk("skbaddr=%p", __entry->skbaddr)
>> +
>> +);
>> +
>> +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, consume_skb,
>> +
>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(skb)
>> +
>> +);
>> +
>> +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, dev_kfree_skb_irq,
>> +
>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(skb)
>> +
>> +);
>> +
>> +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, skb_free_datagram_locked,
>> +
>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(skb)
>> +
>> +);
>> +
>
> Why create these last two tracepoints at all? dev_kfree_skb_irq will eventually
> pass through kfree_skb anyway, getting picked up by the tracepoint there, the
> while the latter won't (since it uses __kfree_skb instead), I think that could
> be fixed up by add a call to trace_kfree_skb there directly, saving you two
> tracepoints.
>
> Neil
>
I think dev_kfree_skb_irq isn't chased by trace_kfree_skb or trace_consume_skb
completely. Because net_tx_action frees skb by __kfree_skb. So it is better to
add trace_kfree_skb before it. skb_free_datagram_locked is same.
Thanks,
Koki Sanagi.
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists