lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:51:36 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	dann frazier <dannf@...ian.org>
Cc:	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: ia64 hang/mca running gdb 'make check'

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:35:12 -0600
dann frazier <dannf@...ian.org> wrote:

> Debian's ia64 autobuilders have been experiencing system crashes while
> trying to run the gdb test suite:
>   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588574
> 
> I was able to reproduce this w/ the latest git tree, and bisected it
> down to this commit, introduced in 2.6.32:
> 
>   commit 62eede62dafb4a6633eae7ffbeb34c60dba5e7b1
>   Author: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
>   Date:   Mon Sep 21 17:03:34 2009 -0700
> 
>     mm: ZERO_PAGE without PTE_SPECIAL
> 
>     Reinstate anonymous use of ZERO_PAGE to all architectures, not just to
>     those which __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL: as suggested by Nick Piggin.
> 
>     Contrary to how I'd imagined it, there's nothing ugly about this, just a
>     zero_pfn test built into one or another block of vm_normal_page().
> 
>     But the MIPS ZERO_PAGE-of-many-colours case demands is_zero_pfn() and
>     my_zero_pfn() inlines.  Reinstate its mremap move_pte() shuffling of
>     ZERO_PAGEs we did from 2.6.17 to 2.6.19?  Not unless someone shouts for
>     that: it would have to take vm_flags to weed out some cases.
> 
> fyi, I found this to not be reproducible on SLES11 SP1 (which is
> 2.6.32-based). I compared the .configs and found that the relevant
> difference is the PAGE_SIZE. It does not fail w/ 64KB pages, but
> reliably fails w/ 16KB pages.
> 

Sorry, I have no idea...
Hmm, what is the address of empty_zero_page[] on your debian(16kb-page) ?

Thanks,
-Kame




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ