[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100721132159.GN6418@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:21:59 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@...dbalancer.org>,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Julius Volz <julius.volz@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hannes Eder <heder@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2.6 4/4] libxt_ipvs: user-space lib for netfilter
matcher xt_ipvs
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:35:19AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 2010-07-21 03:21, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> +
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_IPVS_PROPERTY (1 << 0) /* all other options imply this one */
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_PROTO (1 << 1)
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_VADDR (1 << 2)
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_VPORT (1 << 3)
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_DIR (1 << 4)
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_METHOD (1 << 5)
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_VPORTCTL (1 << 6)
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_MASK ((1 << 7) - 1)
> >> +#define XT_IPVS_ONCE_MASK (XT_IPVS_MASK & ~XT_IPVS_IPVS_PROPERTY)
>
> Can't these just be an enum?
More than one option can be used at once - they form a mini bitmap -
so no, I don't think we can use an enum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists