linux-kernel - re: i915 boot regression on Q35 chipset with 2.6.35-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8u3s94$g0j0tc@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:37:23 +0100
From:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:	tim.gardner@...onical.com, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Cc:	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, eric@...olt.net,
	Kees Cook <kees@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Gordon Jin <gordon.jin@...el.com>
Subject: re: i915 boot regression on Q35 chipset with 2.6.35-rc4

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:35:22 +0200, Tim Gardner <tcanonical@....com> wrote:
> What's up with this patch? I haven't received any comment, nor has it 
> appeared in your git repository.

Dave hasn't taken it because it is a regression fix for i915 and the
current procedure is for those to go through Eric's tree. Eric has been
busy working on a new compiler for GLSL the last few weeks and has been
applying patches in batches.

The patch I am happy to ack, but since I introduced the regression 
[https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294], I'd rather have
someone more familiar with the intricacies of G33/G35/Q35 review it.

For what is worth:
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/