[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C470C2C.2070708@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:03:08 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
dwalker@...eaurora.org, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de,
florian@...kler.org, andi@...stfloor.org, mst@...hat.com,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ_UNBOUND
Just a bit of clarification.
On 07/21/2010 04:59 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> I should've been clearer: As I understand it, normal (unbound) worker items
In workqueue land, normal workqueues would be bound to CPUs while
workers for WQ_UNBOUND workqueues aren't affined to any specific CPU.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists