[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilSR15Cmz-dTyIDvOl-qdYrQ6x84BY7f9LggElW@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:46:11 -0500
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
sfrench@...ba.org, anton@...ba.org, swhiteho@...hat.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] cifs: use workqueue instead of slow-work
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Workqueue can now handle high concurrency. Use system_nrt_wq
> instead of slow-work.
>
> * Updated is_valid_oplock_break() to not call cifs_oplock_break_put()
> as advised by Steve French. It might cause deadlock. Instead,
> reference is increased after queueing succeeded and
> cifs_oplock_break() briefly grabs GlobalSMBSeslock before putting
> the cfile to make sure it doesn't put before the matching get is
> finished.
>
> * Anton Blanchard reported that cifs conversion was using now gone
> system_single_wq. Use system_nrt_wq which provides non-reentrance
> guarantee which is enough and much better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
> ---
> fs/cifs/Kconfig | 1 -
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 5 -----
> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 8 +++++---
> fs/cifs/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/cifs/file.c | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
> fs/cifs/misc.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists