[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <op.vf7ofuif7p4s8u@pikus>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:56:08 +0200
From: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@...sung.com>,
Xiaolin Zhang <xiaolin.zhang@...el.com>,
Hiremath Vaibhav <hvaibhav@...com>,
Robert Fekete <robert.fekete@...ricsson.com>,
Marcus Lorentzon <marcus.xm.lorentzon@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:45:43 +0200, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Your not hearing the issues.. IT'S TOO COMPLEX! Please remove it.
Remove what exactly?
The command line parameter? It's like 50 lines of code, so I don't
see any benefits.
The possibility to specify the configuration? It would defy the whole
purpose of CMA, so I won't do that.
The complexity has to be there one way or the other and even though
I am aware that less complex code is the better and am trying to
remove unnecessary complexity but saying “remove it” won't make any
good unless you provide me with a better alternative. At this point,
I am still convinced that the string parameters are the best option.
--
Best regards, _ _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists